{"id":33261,"date":"2025-11-27T17:01:45","date_gmt":"2025-11-27T16:01:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/observatoirecetelem.com\/?page_id=33261"},"modified":"2025-11-27T18:17:12","modified_gmt":"2025-11-27T17:17:12","slug":"transition-energetique-une-intention-reelle-mais-contrariee","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/observatoirecetelem.com\/en\/observatoire-cetelem-habitat\/observatoire-cetelem-de-lhabitat-2025\/transition-energetique-une-intention-reelle-mais-contrariee","title":{"rendered":"Energy transition, a genuine intention, but hindered"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Access to energy renovation: An issue that goes beyond the sole question of cost<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n\n
\n

Despite financial reason being an important reason for Europeans, 42% of them are abandoning their renovation project due to non-financial reasons only. (Fig.13 et Fig.14)<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n

\n

Overall reasons for abandoning energy efficiency work<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n\n
\n
\n
\n

\n Fig 13 – Reasons for abandoning energy renovation work\n <\/p>\n \n \n T\u00e9l\u00e9charger cette infographie pour vos pr\u00e9sentations\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n

\n
\n \"Graph\n \n The image presents vertical bars for several European countries, indicating the main reasons for abandoning energy renovation work. Three categories appear: purple: only financial reasons, gray: financial reasons combined with others, light green: only non-financial reasons.\n\nThe data indicated is: \nGermany: 22% financial reasons, 23% combined, 55% non-financial. \nUnited Kingdom: 23%, 26%, 51%. \nNetherlands: 28%, 21%, 51%. \nBelgium: 33%, 24%, 43%. \nEurope: 34%, 24%, 42%. \nSpain: 34%, 24%, 42%. \nFrance: 42%, 26%, 32%.\nItaly: 42%, 23%, 35%. \nPortugal: 50%, 21%, 29%.\n\nThe graph shows that pure financial reasons are an important reason for abandonment in several countries, but non-financial reasons are also frequent.\n <\/span>\n <\/figure>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n
\n

Detailed reasons for abandoning energy efficiency work<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n\n
\n
\n
\n

\n Fig 14 – Details of reasons for abandoning energy renovation\n <\/p>\n \n \n T\u00e9l\u00e9charger cette infographie pour vos pr\u00e9sentations\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n

\n
\n \"Graph\n \n The visual presents a horizontal histogram detailing the specific reasons for abandoning energy renovation work.\n\nThe data indicated is: \nOther reason: 5%.\nLack of agreement on projects: 12%. \nLack of sensitivity to the subject: 12%. \nAdministrative reasons: 19%. \nLack of information: 18%. \nProposals considered unconvincing: 22%. \nLack of craftsmen or products for the project: 21%. \nFinancial reasons: 58%.\n\nThe most frequent reason is far and away the financial factor, significantly higher than other reasons.\n <\/span>\n <\/figure>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n
\n

The housing budget: A financial burden for one household out of three<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n\n
\n
    \n
  • For 33% of Europeans, the housing budget situation is difficult (vs. 35% in 2024). (Fig.15)<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/div><\/ul>\n<\/div>\n\n
    \n
    \n
    \n

    \n Fig 15 – Perception of budget situation related to housing\n <\/p>\n \n \n T\u00e9l\u00e9charger cette infographie pour vos pr\u00e9sentations\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n

    \n
    \n \"Distribution\n \n The infographic shows a ring diagram showing how respondents evaluate their budget situation regarding housing. \nThe data presented is: \nEasy: 67%. \nDifficult: 33%.\n\nThe infographic highlights that two-thirds of respondents consider their budget situation easy, while one-third considers it difficult.\n <\/span>\n <\/figure>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n
    \n

    Public aid: Decisive but difficult to access<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n\n
    \n
      \n
    • 43% of Europeans say that public aid is understandable but difficult to implement. (Fig.16)<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/div>\n\n
      \n
    • 69% of Europeans say that state or public bodies cover between 10% and 50% of expenses. (Fig.17)<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/div><\/ul>\n<\/div>\n\n
      \n
      \n
      \n

      \n Fig 16 – Perception of public financial aid\n <\/p>\n \n \n T\u00e9l\u00e9charger cette infographie pour vos pr\u00e9sentations\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n

      \n
      \n \"Distribution\n \n The infographic presents a ring diagram distributing four opinions concerning the understanding of public financial aid.\n\nThe data displayed is: \nEasy to understand: 12%. \nUnderstandable but difficult to implement: 43%. \nToo complex to understand: 26%. \nDoes not know the devices: 19%.\n\nThe distribution indicates that the majority considers the aid understandable but difficult to apply, while a significant part considers the devices complex or unknown.\n <\/span>\n <\/figure>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n
      \n
      \n
      \n

      \n Fig 17 – Proportion of renovation costs covered by public aid\n <\/p>\n \n \n T\u00e9l\u00e9charger cette infographie pour vos pr\u00e9sentations\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n

      \n
      \n \"Distribution\n \n The visual presents a ring diagram indicating the estimated proportion of renovation costs covered by state or public aid.\n\nThe data displayed is: \nLess than 10%: 7%. \nBetween 10% and 30%: 41%. \nBetween 30% and 50%: 28%. \nMore than 50%: 9%. \nNo idea: 15%.\n\nThe distribution shows that a majority estimates that aid covers less than 30% of costs or claims not to know the amount covered.\n <\/span>\n <\/figure>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n
      \n

      Financing: A complexity to overcome to facilitate action<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n\n
      \n
        \n
      • 60% of Europeans have another principal barrier to financing renovation works than interest rates. (Fig.18)<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/div>\n\n
        \n
      • 23% of Europeans see the difficulty to understand, identify, and evaluate offers as a main barrier to financing renovation works. (Fig.18)<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/div><\/ul>\n<\/div>\n\n
        \n
        \n
        \n

        \n Fig 18 – Obstacles to financing work\n <\/p>\n \n \n T\u00e9l\u00e9charger cette infographie pour vos pr\u00e9sentations\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n

        \n
        \n \"Distribution\n \n The image presents a ring diagram listing four obstacles identified for financing work.\n\nThe data displayed is: \nComplex procedures: 17%. \nOffers difficult to understand, identify, and evaluate: 23%. \nHigh interest rates: 40%. \nLack of clear information on credit terms: 20%.\n\nThe most frequently cited obstacle is high interest rates, followed by the difficulty in analyzing financing offers.\n <\/span>\n <\/figure>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n
        \n

        A quick ROI: A condition for commitment, difficult to meet<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n\n
        \n
          \n
        • 57% of Europeans expect profitability within 5 years for their energy renovation. (Fig.19)<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/div>\n\n
          \n
        • 45% of Europeans think that the cost of works is a priority criterion when deciding on renovation projects. (Fig.20)<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/div><\/ul>\n<\/div>\n\n
          \n
          \n
          \n

          \n Fig 19 – Perceived acceptable deadline for an investment to be profitable\n <\/p>\n \n \n T\u00e9l\u00e9charger cette infographie pour vos pr\u00e9sentations\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n

          \n
          \n \"Distribution\n \n The visual presents a ring diagram indicating the duration considered acceptable for an investment to be considered profitable.\n\nThe data displayed is: \n1 year: 17%.\nLess than 5 years: 40%. \nLess than 10 years: 18%. \nMore than 10 years: 4%. \nNever profitable: 21%.\n\nThis distribution shows that the majority considers that an investment should be profitable in less than five years, while one in five respondents believes it will never be profitable.\n <\/span>\n <\/figure>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n
          \n
          \n
          \n

          \n Fig 20 – Priority criteria for choosing work\n <\/p>\n \n \n T\u00e9l\u00e9charger cette infographie pour vos pr\u00e9sentations\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n

          \n
          \n \"Rank\n \n The infographic presents a horizontal histogram listing six criteria that may influence the choice of type of work to be done.\n\nThe data displayed is: \nDisruption caused: 7%. \nDuration of work: 8%. \nScope of work: 9%. \nFeasibility: 11%. \nEnergy efficiency: 20%. \nCost of work: 45%.\n\nThe most cited criterion is the cost of work, followed by energy efficiency.\n <\/span>\n <\/figure>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

          Access to energy renovation: An issue that goes beyond the sole question of cost Despite financial reason being an important reason for Europeans, 42% of them are abandoning their renovation project due to non-financial reasons only. (Fig.13 et Fig.14) Overall reasons for abandoning energy efficiency work Detailed reasons for abandoning energy efficiency work The housing budget: A […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1980,"featured_media":0,"parent":33416,"menu_order":1,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"t-etude-chapitre.php","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"tags":[],"class_list":["post-33261","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/observatoirecetelem.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/33261","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/observatoirecetelem.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/observatoirecetelem.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/observatoirecetelem.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1980"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/observatoirecetelem.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=33261"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/observatoirecetelem.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/33261\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":33477,"href":"https:\/\/observatoirecetelem.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/33261\/revisions\/33477"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/observatoirecetelem.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/33416"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/observatoirecetelem.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=33261"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/observatoirecetelem.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=33261"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}