{"id":33304,"date":"2025-11-27T17:00:41","date_gmt":"2025-11-27T16:00:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/observatoirecetelem.com\/?page_id=33304"},"modified":"2025-11-27T18:29:50","modified_gmt":"2025-11-27T17:29:50","slug":"energy-transition-the-10-drivers-for-taking-action","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/observatoirecetelem.com\/en\/observatoire-cetelem-habitat\/observatoire-cetelem-de-lhabitat-2025\/energy-transition-the-10-drivers-for-taking-action","title":{"rendered":"Energy transition: The 10 drivers for taking action"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Thermal comfort: A sensitive driver amplified by seasonality<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n\n
\n
    \n
  • 29% of Europeans experience an unpleasant or very unpleasant season. (Fig.21)<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/div>\n\n
    \n
  • 21% of Europeans experience an unpleasant or very unpleasant winter season. (Fig.22)<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/div><\/ul>\n<\/div>\n\n
    \n
    \n
    \n

    \n Fig 21 – Comfort of the home according to seasons\n <\/p>\n \n \n Download this infographic for your presentations\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n

    \n
    \n \"Compare\n \n The infographic presents a vertical histogram comparing the perception of comfort in the home according to four seasons: spring, summer, autumn, and winter. For each season, four comfort levels are represented by colored bars: dark green: very pleasant, light green: pleasant, light purple: unpleasant, dark purple: very unpleasant.\n\nThe data displayed is: \nSpring: 53% very pleasant; 41% pleasant; 5% unpleasant; 1% very unpleasant. \nSummer: 43%; 40%; 14%; 3%. \nAutumn: 45%; 46%; 8%; 1%. \nWinter: 36%; 43%; 16%; 5%.\n\nThe distribution shows a generally high comfort level in spring and autumn, while winter presents more discomfort.\n <\/span>\n <\/figure>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n
    \n
    \n
    \n

    \n Fig 22 – Global perception of comfort according to seasons\n <\/p>\n \n \n Download this infographic for your presentations\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n

    \n
    \n \"Distribution\n \n The image presents a ring diagram grouping the levels of comfort felt in the home according to the presence of pleasant or unpleasant seasons. The legend specifies four categories: dark purple: at least one very unpleasant season, light purple: at least one unpleasant season, light green: pleasant in all seasons, dark green: very pleasant in all seasons.\n\nThe data displayed is: \nAt least one very unpleasant season: 6%. \nAt least one unpleasant season: 23%. \nPleasant in all seasons: 47%. \nVery pleasant in all seasons: 24%.\n\nThe majority of respondents declares a stable and positive comfort level throughout the year.\n <\/span>\n <\/figure>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n
    \n

    Habits: The first step that triggers action<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n\n
    \n
      \n
    • 82% of Europeans say that everyday actions are necessary to reduce energy consumption. (Fig.23)<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/div>\n\n
      \n
    • If electricity prices doubled by 2030, 30% of Europeans say they would reduce their consumption. (Fig.24)<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/div><\/ul>\n<\/div>\n\n
      \n
      \n
      \n

      \n Fig 23 – Planned actions to reduce energy costs\n <\/p>\n \n \n Download this infographic for your presentations\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n

      \n
      \n \"Rank\n \n The visual presents a horizontal histogram describing several actions that respondents plan to optimize or reduce their energy consumption costs.\n\nThe data displayed is: \nShare living spaces: 27%. \nChange energy supplier: 51%. \nStrengthen equipment maintenance: 66%. \nReplace electronic appliances: 67%. \nReduce heating or air conditioning: 71%. \nMake daily gestures to save energy: 82%.\n\nDaily gestures and reducing heating\/air conditioning appear to be the most frequently planned actions.\n <\/span>\n <\/figure>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n
      \n
      \n
      \n

      \n Fig 24 – Planned actions in case of an increase in the price of electricity\n <\/p>\n \n \n Download this infographic for your presentations\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n

      \n
      \n \"Distribution\n \n The infographic presents a ring diagram illustrating the actions that respondents would consider if the price of electricity were to double by 2030.\n\nThe data displayed is: \nReduce consumption: 30%. \nChange supplier: 23%. \nProduce own energy: 19%. \nHave more efficient equipment: 13%. \nNo action\/not concerned: 11%. \nDon’t know: 4%.\n\nThe majority plans to reduce consumption or change suppliers, while a significant portion considers self-producing energy or improving equipment.\n <\/span>\n <\/figure>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n
      \n

      A concrete example: When renovation proves its effectiveness<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n\n
      \n
        \n
      • 66% of Europeans have noticed a decrease in their energy bills after renovation works. (Fig.25)<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/div>\n\n
        \n
      • 71% of Europeans found that their energy savings after renovation met or exceeded their expectations. (Fig.26)<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/div><\/ul>\n<\/div>\n\n
        \n
        \n
        \n

        \n Fig 25 – Observed decrease in energy bills after work\n <\/p>\n \n \n Download this infographic for your presentations\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n

        \n
        \n \"Distribution\n \n The image shows a ring diagram representing the monthly decrease observed in energy bills after the completion of work.\n\nThe data displayed is: \nNo decrease: 17%. \nBetween 10% and 20%: 37%. \nBetween 20% and 30%: 16%. \nBetween 30% and 40%: 7%. \nBetween 40% and 50%: 4%. \nMore than 50%: 2%. \nIncrease in bill: 3%. \nNo idea: 14%.\n\nA majority declares a decrease between 10% and 20%, while a small percentage indicates an increase or no decrease.\n <\/span>\n <\/figure>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n
        \n
        \n
        \n

        \n Fig 26 – Gap between expected and observed decrease\n <\/p>\n \n \n Download this infographic for your presentations\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n

        \n
        \n \"Compare\n \n The infographic presents a horizontal histogram comparing the observed decrease in energy bills with the expected decrease by the respondents. Three categories appear.\n\nThe data displayed is: \nHigher than expected: 24%. \nIn line with expectations: 47%. \nLower than expected: 29%.\n\nThe majority of respondents indicates that the observed decrease corresponds to their expectations, while about a third judges it to be lower or higher than expected.\n <\/span>\n <\/figure>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n
        \n

        The social circle: The decisive role of relatives and professionals<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n\n
        \n
          \n
        • 75% of Europeans are influenced by their relatives. (Fig.27)<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/div>\n\n
          \n
        • 70% of Europeans are influenced by professionals. (Fig.27)<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/div><\/ul>\n<\/div>\n\n
          \n
          \n
          \n

          \n Fig 27 – Perceived influence in housing projects\n <\/p>\n \n \n Download this infographic for your presentations\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n

          \n
          \n \"Compare\n \n The infographic presents a histogram comparing the proportion of people who claim to be influenced or not by different actors when it comes to housing projects.\n\nThe data indicated is: \nClose ones: 75% yes, 25% no. \nProfessionals: 70% yes, 30% no. \nMedia: 50% yes, 50% no. \nSocial networks: 42% yes, 58% no.\n\nClose ones and professionals are perceived as the most frequent sources of influence, while social networks appear to be the least influential actor.\n <\/span>\n <\/figure>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n
          \n

          Education: Informing and guiding to trigger action<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n\n
          \n
            \n
          • 57% of Europeans consider themselves informed or very informed about the work that exist to reduce energy consumption. (Fig.28)<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/div><\/ul>\n<\/div>\n\n
            \n
            \n
            \n

            \n Fig 28 – Feeling of information on energy-saving work\n <\/p>\n \n \n Download this infographic for your presentations\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n

            \n
            \n \"Distribution\n \n The infographic presents a grouped histogram showing how respondents evaluate their level of information on three topics related to renovation and energy savings.\n\nThe data displayed is: \nWork to reduce energy consumption \nVery well informed: 13%, \nWell informed: 44%, \nRather poorly informed: 34%, \nVery poorly informed: 9%.\n\nBudget for work to be planned \nVery well informed: 12%, \nWell informed: 39%, \nRather poorly informed: 38%, \nVery poorly informed: 11%.\n\nSavings after work and daily gestures \nVery well informed: 16%, \nWell informed: 43%, \nRather poorly informed: 32%, \nVery poorly informed: 9%.\n\nOverall, the majority says they are well informed, but a significant portion considers themselves rather poorly informed, especially regarding the budget to be planned.\n <\/span>\n <\/figure>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n
            \n

            Energy commitment: A lever for property value enhancement<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n\n
            \n
              \n
            • 88% of Europeans believe that investing in their home impacts or will impact the value of their property. (Fig.29)<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/div>\n\n
              \n
            • 43% of Europeans declare that investing in their home already impacts the value of their property. (Fig.29)<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/div><\/ul>\n<\/div>\n\n
              \n
              \n
              \n

              \n Fig 29 – Perceived impact of energy performance on real estate value\n <\/p>\n \n \n Download this infographic for your presentations\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n

              \n
              \n \"Indicates\n \n The image presents a ring diagram illustrating the perception of the impact of energy performance on the value of a real estate property.\n\nThe data is: \nAlready has an impact: 43%. \nWill have an impact: 45%. \nWill never have an impact: 12%.\n\nThe majority believes that energy performance already influences, or will influence in the future, the value of a real estate property.\n <\/span>\n <\/figure>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n
              \n

              Public aid: A trigger for a majority of homeowners<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n\n
              \n
                \n
              • 41% of Europeans would give up or reduce renovation works for financial reasons. (Fig.30)<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/div><\/ul>\n<\/div>\n\n
                \n
                \n
                \n

                \n Fig 30 – Actions considered without public aid\n <\/p>\n \n \n Download this infographic for your presentations\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n

                \n
                \n \"Presents\n \n The infographic shows two aligned histograms. The first indicates the interest in a financing solution proposed directly by the company performing the work. The second measures the perceived usefulness of integrated financing in the renovation quote. The values are indicated for all respondents and by country.\n\nInterest in a financing solution proposed by the company \nAll: 58%. \nGermany: 54%. \nBelgium: 49%. Spain: 72%. \nFrance: 55%. \nItaly: 62%. \nPoland: 64%. \nPortugal: 56%. \nUnited Kingdom: 52%.\n\nPerceived usefulness of integrated financing in the quote \nAll: 60%. \nGermany: 56%. \nBelgium: 50%. \nSpain: 74%. \nFrance: 56%. \nItaly: 65%. \nPoland: 67%. \nPortugal: 60%. \nUnited Kingdom: 52%.\n\nThe results show a globally high interest and perceived usefulness, particularly in Spain, Poland, and Italy.\n <\/span>\n <\/figure>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n
                \n

                Integrated financing vs. traditional bank credit<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n\n
                \n
                  \n
                • 58% of Europeans would be interested if the credit offer was proposed directly by the company. (Fig.31)<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/div>\n\n
                  \n
                • 60% of Europeans would find financing integrated directly into renovation quotes useful. (Fig.31)<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/div><\/ul>\n<\/div>\n\n
                  \n
                  \n
                  \n

                  \n Fig 31 – Interest in integrated financing for renovation work\n <\/p>\n \n \n Download this infographic for your presentations\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n

                  \n
                  \n \"Presents\n \n The infographic shows two aligned histograms. The first indicates the interest in a financing solution proposed directly by the company performing the work. The second measures the perceived usefulness of integrated financing in the renovation quote. The values are indicated for all respondents and by country.\n\nInterest in a financing solution proposed by the company \nAll: 58%. \nGermany: 54%. \nBelgium: 49%. Spain: 72%. \nFrance: 55%. \nItaly: 62%. \nPoland: 64%. \nPortugal: 56%. \nUnited Kingdom: 52%.\n\nPerceived usefulness of integrated financing in the quote \nAll: 60%. \nGermany: 56%. \nBelgium: 50%. \nSpain: 74%. \nFrance: 56%. \nItaly: 65%. \nPoland: 67%. \nPortugal: 60%. \nUnited Kingdom: 52%.\n\nThe results show a globally high interest and perceived usefulness, particularly in Spain, Poland, and Italy.\n <\/span>\n <\/figure>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n
                  \n

                  Attractivity of integrated financing vs. traditional bank credit<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n\n
                  \n
                  \n
                  \n

                  \n Fig 32 – Attractiveness of financing methods\n <\/p>\n \n \n Download this infographic for your presentations\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n

                  \n
                  \n \"Compares\n \n The infographic presents a histogram comparing the proportion of people who consider two financing methods attractive: classic bank credit and integrated financing proposed by the company performing the work. The data is organized by country.\n\nThe values displayed are: \nEuropean Union: 47% classic financing, 60% integrated financing. \nPoland: 47% classic, 67% integrated. \nSpain: 56% classic, 74% integrated. \nItaly: 52% classic, 65% integrated. \nPortugal: 35% classic, 60% integrated. \nUnited Kingdom: 41% classic, 52% integrated. \nFrance: 45% classic, 56% integrated. \nGermany: 47% classic, 56% integrated. \nBelgium: 52% classic, 50% integrated.\n\nIn most countries, integrated financing is perceived as more attractive than classic financing, with significant gaps in Spain, Portugal, and the country represented by the red and white flag. Belgium is the only case where integrated financing is slightly less attractive.\n <\/span>\n <\/figure>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n
                  \n

                  Managing consumption: Regaining control of the transition<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n\n
                  \n
                    \n
                  • 74% of Europeans are already equipped or are interested in getting equipped. (Fig.33 et Fig.34 et Fig.35)<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/div><\/ul>\n<\/div>\n\n
                    \n
                    \n
                    \n

                    \n Fig 33 – Current equipment\n <\/p>\n \n \n Download this infographic for your presentations\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n

                    \n
                    \n \"Equipment\n \n The graph compares the current equipment for four solutions: \nEnergy tracking application: 21% \nAutomated heating system: 17% \nRemote home automation control: 16% \nIntelligent optimization sensors: 14%\n\nNo equipment reaches 25%, which shows a relatively low current adoption of these devices.\n <\/span>\n <\/figure>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n
                    \n
                    \n
                    \n

                    \n Fig 34 – Current equipment and willingness to equip\n <\/p>\n \n \n Download this infographic for your presentations\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n

                    \n
                    \n \"Distribution\n \n The graph presents three categories: \nAlready equipped with at least one solution: 37% \nNot equipped but interested in equipping: 37% \nNot equipped and not interested: 26%\n\nThose already equipped and those interested in equipping are represented in equal proportions, while a quarter of respondents do not plan to equip themselves.\n <\/span>\n <\/figure>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n
                    \n
                    \n
                    \n

                    \n Fig 35 – Planned equipment\n <\/p>\n \n \n Download this infographic for your presentations\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n

                    \n
                    \n \"Intention\n \n The graph presents the devices that households intend to acquire: \nIntelligent optimization sensors: 45% \nEnergy tracking application: 42% \nAutomated heating system: 39% \nRemote home automation control: 37%\n\nAll equipment is considered by a significant proportion of respondents, with a preference for intelligent sensors.\n <\/span>\n <\/figure>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n
                    \n

                    Energy autonomy: From latent dream to possible breakthrough<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n\n
                    \n
                      \n
                    • 35% of Europeans would be ready to produce their own energy if storage became affordable. (Fig.36 et Fig.37)<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/div><\/ul>\n<\/div>\n\n
                      \n
                      \n
                      \n

                      \n Fig 36 – Impact of electricity quotas and tripled prices\n <\/p>\n \n \n Download this infographic for your presentations\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n

                      \n
                      \n \"Pie\n \n The graph shows four possible responses to a system of electricity quotas combined with tripled prices. \nThe proportions are as follows: \n47% state that they would change their habits. \n23% would consider investing in equipment to reduce their consumption. \n20% would seek to equip themselves to produce their own energy. \n10% would accept paying more in case of excess.\n <\/span>\n <\/figure>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n
                      \n
                      \n
                      \n

                      \n Fig 37 – Impact of affordable storage and efficient solar panels\n <\/p>\n \n \n Download this infographic for your presentations\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n

                      \n
                      \n \"Pie\n \n The graph presents three possible options in the event of improved and democratized energy storage and solar panels. \nThe responses are distributed as follows: \n39% would choose to equip themselves to produce their own energy. \n27% would consider setting up a local energy sharing system. \n34% state that they would do nothing.\n <\/span>\n <\/figure>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

                      Thermal comfort: A sensitive driver amplified by seasonality Habits: The first step that triggers action A concrete example: When renovation proves its effectiveness The social circle: The decisive role of relatives and professionals Education: Informing and guiding to trigger action Energy commitment: A lever for property value enhancement Public aid: A trigger for a majority […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1980,"featured_media":0,"parent":33416,"menu_order":1,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"t-etude-chapitre.php","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"tags":[],"class_list":["post-33304","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/observatoirecetelem.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/33304","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/observatoirecetelem.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/observatoirecetelem.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/observatoirecetelem.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1980"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/observatoirecetelem.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=33304"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/observatoirecetelem.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/33304\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":33487,"href":"https:\/\/observatoirecetelem.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/33304\/revisions\/33487"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/observatoirecetelem.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/33416"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/observatoirecetelem.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=33304"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/observatoirecetelem.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=33304"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}