{"id":36420,"date":"2026-10-06T12:34:26","date_gmt":"2026-10-06T10:34:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/observatoirecetelem.com\/?page_id=36420"},"modified":"2026-10-06T12:34:26","modified_gmt":"2026-10-06T10:34:26","slug":"financial-considerations-take-precedence","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/observatoirecetelem.com\/en\/lobservatoire-cetelem-de-lautomobile\/observatoire-automotive-2027-country-or-price-motorists-have-made-their-choice\/financial-considerations-take-precedence","title":{"rendered":"Financial considerations take precedence"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"container\">\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">THE PRIMACY OF PRICE<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n\n<div class=\"container\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">When push comes to shove, despite contrasting views on brand origin in places like Japan or among younger drivers, which factor ultimately carries the most weight? Across successive editions of the Observatoire Cetelem, whether tracking cars or broader retail trends, the result recurs year after year with the predictability of a Philip Glass score. Price remains the single most important factor for motorists when choosing a car. Indeed, 4 in 10 highlight it for a new vehicle purchase, rising to more than 5 in 10 for a second-hand model. Price emerges decisively as the primary criterion across every surveyed country, with the exception of China, where reliability is preferred. French consumers display the highest price sensitivity, followed closely by Belgian, Portuguese and Japanese drivers. It carries greater weight among older demographics than among younger generations. Predictably, lower-income households and rural residents are particularly sensitive to price.&nbsp;<strong>(Fig. 34)<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n<div class=\"container block-infographie\">\n  <div class=\"infographie\">\n                    <div class=\"infographie-header\">\n            <p id=\"infographie-36338\">\n            Fig. 34 \u2013 Most important criteria in choosing a car, depending on whether the current car was bought new or used (%, max. 3 answers)\n        <\/p>\n    \n            <a\n            class=\"download download-link\"\n            href=\"https:\/\/observatoirecetelem.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/observatoire-auto-2027_gb_fig-34.png\"\n            download\n            aria-describedby=\"infographie-36338\"        >\n            Download this infographic for your presentations\n        <\/a>\n        <\/div>\n          <div class=\"infographie-image-wrapper\">\n                          <figure>\n          <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/observatoirecetelem.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/observatoire-auto-2027_gb_fig-34.png\" alt=\"Paired bar chart of 19 car-choice criteria: price ranks first (39% for new, 52% for used); mileage matters far more for used cars (23%) than new (9%).\" class=\"img-fluid\"  aria-describedby=\"figcap-36338\"\/>\n          <span class=\"sr-only\" id=\"figcap-36338\">\n            Horizontal paired bar chart. Question: &#8220;Which of the following criteria do\/would you take most into account when choosing a car?&#8221; Base: all countries total, all respondents, in %. Multiple responses allowed, maximum 3. Two series: current car bought new (NC) and current car bought used (UC). Source: Observatoire Cetelem de l&#8217;automobile 2027.\nData, in the form new \/ used:\n\u2022 Price: 39% \/ 52%\n\u2022 Safety: 32% \/ 26%\n\u2022 Reliability and durability: 27% \/ 25%\n\u2022 Running costs: 19% \/ 23%\n\u2022 Brand: 18% \/ 16%\n\u2022 Mileage on the odometer: 9% \/ 23%\n\u2022 Performance and power: 17% \/ 15%\n\u2022 Vehicle size: 14% \/ 14%\n\u2022 Driving pleasure and road handling: 14% \/ 12%\n\u2022 Style and design: 13% \/ 11%\n\u2022 Environmental impact: 10% \/ 7%\n\u2022 Versatility (urban and long-distance): 9% \/ 7%\n\u2022 Technological innovation \/ novelty of the model: 10% \/ 5%\n\u2022 Abundance of features\/equipment: 7% \/ 5%\n\u2022 Resale value: 7% \/ 6%\n\u2022 Country of manufacture: 6% \/ 4%\n\u2022 The image projected by the vehicle: 6% \/ 4%\n\u2022 Availability \/ delivery lead times: 5% \/ 3%\n\u2022 Range: 3% \/ 1%\nPrice is the top criterion for both groups, and even more so for used-car buyers. New-car buyers give more weight to safety, innovation and brand. Used-car buyers give more weight to price, running costs and mileage.\n          <\/span>\n        <\/figure>\n            <\/div>\n      <\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n<div class=\"container\">\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">THE COST OF WALKING AWAY<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n\n<div class=\"container\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Price is not merely a decisive purchasing factor; it is also the primary deal-breaker. Exerting far more influence than brand identity itself, its power to dictate consumer behaviour is absolute. Indeed, 6 in 10 motorists have decided against buying a particular brand simply due to its high price tag. Spanish and Italian consumers are the most likely to have walked away for this reason, in stark contrast to British, Chinese, Japanese and American drivers, who prove far less price-sensitive. Price is a major deal-breaker in France, as well. Younger buyers and rural residents are similarly responsive to this factor.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n<div class=\"container block-infographie\">\n  <div class=\"infographie\">\n                    <div class=\"infographie-header\">\n            <p id=\"infographie-36340\">\n            Fig. 35 \u2013 Waiver of a brand for price reasons (% of &#8220;yes&#8221; by country)\n        <\/p>\n    \n            <a\n            class=\"download download-link\"\n            href=\"https:\/\/observatoirecetelem.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/observatoire-auto-2027_gb_fig-35.png\"\n            download\n            aria-describedby=\"infographie-36340\"        >\n            Download this infographic for your presentations\n        <\/a>\n        <\/div>\n          <div class=\"infographie-image-wrapper\">\n                          <figure>\n          <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/observatoirecetelem.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/observatoire-auto-2027_gb_fig-35.png\" alt=\"Bar chart: share of respondents who have walked away from a brand for price reasons, from 42% in the United Kingdom to 75% in Spain, 62% overall.\" class=\"img-fluid\"  aria-describedby=\"figcap-36340\"\/>\n          <span class=\"sr-only\" id=\"figcap-36340\">\n            Vertical bar chart. Question: &#8220;Have you ever walked away from a brand? (For price reasons)&#8221; \nBase: all respondents, in %, answer &#8220;Yes&#8221;. Source: Observatoire Cetelem de l&#8217;automobile 2027.\nAcross all countries combined, 62% answered yes. Spain is the highest (75%) and the United Kingdom the lowest (42%).\nData by country: Germany 63%, Belgium 68%, China 49%, Spain 75%, United States 51%, France 71%, Italy 74%, Japan 50%, Netherlands 69%, Poland 70%, Portugal 60%, United Kingdom 42%, Turkey 67%. The European average is 66%. The total is 62%.\n          <\/span>\n        <\/figure>\n            <\/div>\n      <\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n<div class=\"container\">\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">PRICE TRUMPS ORIGIN<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n\n<div class=\"container\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">If further proof were needed that price outweighs patriotism, nearly 6 in 10 motorists provide it by choosing a cheaper foreign brand over a domestic equivalent. National resistance is strongest, as is so often the case, in Japan, alongside China and the US. In Portugal, the Netherlands, Spain and Italy, the price argument proves overwhelmingly persuasive. Younger generations are more inclined than older cohorts to opt for a domestic brand, even at a higher price tag. The split between new and used market buyers reveals subtly different priorities. Preference for domestic origin holds firm in the new car sector across the three aforementioned countries, as well as in Germany and France, where figures hit or exceed 50%. This threshold is never reached in the second-hand market, except in Japan and the US, with price winning out in every other nation.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n<div class=\"container block-infographie\">\n  <div class=\"infographie\">\n                    <div class=\"infographie-header\">\n            <p id=\"infographie-36342\">\n            Fig. 36.1 \u2013 Choice between a more expensive domestic car and a cheaper foreign car, current car purchased new (%)\n        <\/p>\n    \n            <a\n            class=\"download download-link\"\n            href=\"https:\/\/observatoirecetelem.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/observatoire-auto-2027_gb_fig-36-1.png\"\n            download\n            aria-describedby=\"infographie-36342\"        >\n            Download this infographic for your presentations\n        <\/a>\n        <\/div>\n          <div class=\"infographie-image-wrapper\">\n                          <figure>\n          <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/observatoirecetelem.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/observatoire-auto-2027_gb_fig-36-1.png\" alt=\"Stacked bar chart: choice between a domestic more expensive car and a foreign cheaper one; overall split 50\/50, Japan 83% domestic, Portugal 68% foreign.\" class=\"img-fluid\"  aria-describedby=\"figcap-36342\"\/>\n          <span class=\"sr-only\" id=\"figcap-36342\">\n            Stacked vertical bar chart. Question: &#8220;Ideally, if you were o\ufb00ered the two equivalent models below, which would you choose? (Domestic\/more expensive vs Foreign\/cheaper)&#8221; Base: all respondents, in %. Filter: current car bought new (NC). Two answers: Car A (domestic, more expensive) and Car B (foreign, cheaper). Source: Observatoire Cetelem de l&#8217;automobile 2027. For all countries combined, the split is 50% Car A and 50% Car B.\nData by country, in the form Car A domestic \/ Car B foreign:\n\u2022 Germany 55% \/ 45%\n\u2022 Belgium 42% \/ 58%\n\u2022 China 58% \/ 42%\n\u2022 Spain 37% \/ 63%\n\u2022 United States 64% \/ 36%\n\u2022 France 50% \/ 50%\n\u2022 Italy 38% \/ 62%\n\u2022 Japan 83% \/ 17%\n\u2022 Netherlands 41% \/ 59%\n\u2022 Poland 44% \/ 56%\n\u2022 Portugal 32% \/ 68%\n\u2022 United Kingdom 49% \/ 51%\n\u2022 Turkey 48% \/ 52%\n\u2022 Europe average 44% \/ 56%\nJapan stands out with a very strong preference for the domestic car (83%). Portugal, Spain and Italy favour the cheaper foreign car most clearly.\n          <\/span>\n        <\/figure>\n            <\/div>\n      <\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n<div class=\"container block-infographie\">\n  <div class=\"infographie\">\n                    <div class=\"infographie-header\">\n            <p id=\"infographie-36344\">\n            Fig. 36.2 \u2013 Choice between a more expensive domestic car and a cheaper foreign car, current car purchased second-hand (%)\n        <\/p>\n    \n            <a\n            class=\"download download-link\"\n            href=\"https:\/\/observatoirecetelem.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/observatoire-auto-2027_gb_fig-36-2.png\"\n            download\n            aria-describedby=\"infographie-36344\"        >\n            Download this infographic for your presentations\n        <\/a>\n        <\/div>\n          <div class=\"infographie-image-wrapper\">\n                          <figure>\n          <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/observatoirecetelem.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/observatoire-auto-2027_gb_fig-36-2.png\" alt=\"Stacked bar chart: choice between a domestic more expensive car and a foreign cheaper one; overall 40% domestic, 60% foreign, Japan 77% domestic.\" class=\"img-fluid\"  aria-describedby=\"figcap-36344\"\/>\n          <span class=\"sr-only\" id=\"figcap-36344\">\n            Stacked vertical bar chart. Question: &#8220;Ideally, if you were o\ufb00ered the two equivalent models below, which would you choose? (Domestic\/more expensive vs Foreign\/cheaper)&#8221; Base: all respondents, in %. Filter: current car bought used (UC). Two answers: Car A (domestic, more expensive) and Car B (foreign, cheaper). Source: Observatoire Cetelem de l&#8217;automobile 2027. For all countries combined, 40% choose Car A and 60% choose Car B.\nData by country, in the form Car A domestic \/ Car B foreign:\n\u2022 Germany 45% \/ 55%\n\u2022 Belgium 38% \/ 62%\n\u2022 China 46% \/ 54%\n\u2022 Spain 35% \/ 65%\n\u2022 United States 50% \/ 50%\n\u2022 France 40% \/ 60%\n\u2022 Italy 32% \/ 68%\n\u2022 Japan 77% \/ 23%\n\u2022 Netherlands 33% \/ 67%\n\u2022 Poland 36% \/ 64%\n\u2022 Portugal 26% \/ 74%\n\u2022 United Kingdom 39% \/ 61%\n\u2022 Turkey 42% \/ 58%\n\u2022 Europe average 37% \/ 63%\nUsed-car buyers choose the cheaper foreign car more often than new-car buyers (60% against 50%, Fig. 36.1). Japan is again the exception with a majority for the domestic car (77%), and Portugal has the highest share for the foreign car (74%).\n          <\/span>\n        <\/figure>\n            <\/div>\n      <\/div>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>THE PRIMACY OF PRICE When push comes to shove, despite contrasting views on brand origin in places like Japan or among younger drivers, which factor ultimately carries the most weight? Across successive editions of the Observatoire Cetelem, whether tracking cars or broader retail trends, the result recurs year after year with the predictability of a [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1945,"featured_media":0,"parent":36450,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"t-etude-chapitre.php","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"tags":[],"class_list":["post-36420","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/observatoirecetelem.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/36420","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/observatoirecetelem.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/observatoirecetelem.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/observatoirecetelem.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1945"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/observatoirecetelem.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=36420"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/observatoirecetelem.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/36420\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":36440,"href":"https:\/\/observatoirecetelem.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/36420\/revisions\/36440"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/observatoirecetelem.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/36450"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/observatoirecetelem.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=36420"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/observatoirecetelem.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=36420"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}