Observe, enlighten and decipher the evolution
of consumption patterns in France and abroad
Section 3 - The reinvention of a union

Complementarity is the watchword

3 minutes of reading
Derided but irreplaceable Criticised but essential Ostracised but timeless Motorists are in a perpetual love-hate relationship with cars. But like many couples who have gone through difficult times and have always been able to talk their way out of tough situations, it looks as though the pair still have a bright future ahead of them. But this will require the terms and scope of their union to be reinvigorated and a new lifestyle to be adopted.

A desire for cars to cohabit with sustainable transport solutions

As we have seen, the status afforded to cars is being called into question, especially in cities. However, it appears that what people would like is not to remove them from the landscape, but rather to establish an open relationship that leaves room for other, more forward-looking forms of transport, preferably carbon-free. Indeed, 82% of the individuals surveyed believe that we can live with fewer cars and more sustainable transport solutions (Fig. 31). This desire for urban cohabitation, in every sense of the word, is shared in all countries.


Fig. 31:


Once again, this is a topic that brings to light the usual geographic divides. On one side are the strongest proponents of such ideas: the emerging and Mediterranean countries, as well as China. On the other are France, Germany and Belgium, the three countries in which Green parties hold the most power, but where people are less vehement in expressing such convictions, given that this form of cohabitation seems self-evident and has already been partly implemented. Sales of traditional and electric bicycles (e-bikes), which were already booming before the health crisis, in addition to the development of cycle lanes in these countries and others, are proof of this.


Fig. 32 / Context:


Fig. 33 / Context:

Urban traffic restrictions are essential, but also too common

On the question of traffic restrictions, there is a similar degree of ambivalence: car use must be controlled, but not to excess.


Fig. 34 / Context:


While 3 in 4 people believe that road space rationing, congestion charges and bans on certain vehicles are essential and useful, more than half also believe that they are too widespread and sufficiently restrictive (Fig. 35). There seems to be a belief that the tipping point between “carrot and stick” is about to be reached and there is no need to go any further. However, this has not prevented some countries from planning a stricter future in which diesel and petrol vehicles will be persona non grata in cities.


Fig. 35:


Fig. 36 / Context:

Sub-section 8
A place of refuge
While economic and use value alone could explain why it is so difficult for people to live without cars, the health crisis has highlighted other reasons why this might be the case. In the 2017 survey
Sub-section 10
A shift towards used cars
Rekindling our relationship with cars also seems dependent on the power of attraction that used vehicles hold now and in the future. On average worldwide, a quarter of upcoming purchases will involv